How well does your state support survivors’ financial security?
Rank: 47th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 23rd
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 20th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 38th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 1st
This state is prioritizing survivors’ financial security in a broad range of policies and is on its way to becoming a Model State!
Learn moreRank: 4th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 10th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 21st
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 4th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 25th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 49th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 6th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 38th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 2nd
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 49th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 38th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 30th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 47th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 25th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 12th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 12th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 12th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 18th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 11th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 51st
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 35th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 30th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 22nd
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 8th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 27th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 18th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 15th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 8th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 23rd
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 35th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 35th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 38th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 3rd
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 42nd
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 16th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 27th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 27th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 30th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 30th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 34th
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
Learn moreRank: 16th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 42nd
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 6th
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
Learn moreRank: 44th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 45th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreRank: 45th
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
Learn moreWe'll be updating our mapping tool as states pass new policies. Sign up below and we'll send you an email when the state(s) you select passes a policy that impacts survivors' financial security.
With the help of some truly incredible pro bono partners, FreeFrom was able to complete research on policies impacting survivors’ financial security in every state and D.C. One of our priorities is to ensure that all of the information in our tool is correct and up-to-date. To that end, we welcome any correction on inaccurate or incomplete information. Thank you in advance for helping us make the Policy Map and Scorecard the best tool it can possibly be!
This state prioritizes survivors’ financial security across all policy categories and is a model for other states to follow!
This state is prioritizing survivors’ financial security in a broad range of policies and is on its way to becoming a Model State!
This state considers survivors’ financial security in multiple policies, and is making progress towards becoming a survivor financial security friendly state
This state somewhat considers survivors’ financial security in a few policies, but has a lot of work to do
This state does not prioritize survivors’ financial security or consider their unique circumstances or needs
This policy has it all!
This policy includes a majority of our Model Policy characteristics
This policy includes some of our Model Policy characteristics, but needs improvement
This state does not have this policy
This policy is harmful for survivors
Tennessee recently passed legislation that expands the state’s definition of domestic violence to include financial abuse and leads the way in the most robust definition of financial abuse in the nation. Senate Bill 979 (2023)
Rhode Island's new law, in addition to preventing a harm-doer from abusive litigation and paying associated attorney’s fees, the harm-doer will be ordered to pay additional damages such as transportation costs, lost wages, and child care incurred due to the abusive litigation. SB 604A (2023)
Vermont’s litigation abuse protections bill has recently passed and will take effect starting September 2023. This includes a list of protections for survivors who are being subjected to further harm through abusive litigation (e.g. when the harm doer is using litigation for the purpose of causing harm to the survivor or maintaining contact with them). HB 45 (2023)
Oregon's bill includes an exemption in reporting to law enforcement requirements for domestic violence survivors. SB 1039 (2023)
California signed into law important legislation that helps survivors get relief from coerced debt. A survivor will be able to submit a "right of action" claim. (ie. providing documentation) to a creditor (i.e. a credit card company) to show the debt was due to coercion. SB 975 (2022)
North Carolina’s bill would protect survivors from coerced debt and would also add the ability for a survivor to sue a harm-doer for the amount of debt incurred in their name, plus attorney’s fees and costs. HB 561 (2023)
Arizona’s bill would expand on current law to allow for a more expansive list of documentation such as letters from qualified 3rd parties; therapists, victim advocates, health professionals, and social workers as evidence. This change would make their current rental protections more accessible to all survivors. SB 1644 (2023)
New Hampshire’s bill would include economic abuse tactics such as interfering with a survivor’s job and controlling their paychecks and assets. HB 549 (2023)
Connecticut's bill would prevent a landlord from discriminating against someone based on their status as a survivor. Raised Bill 906 (2023)
Montana’s will would create a paid sick leave policy that would include safe leave for survivors. HB 386 (2023)